|
Sermon: Bible Sunday
|
DATE |
CHURCH |
SUBJECT |
PREACHER |
BIBLE
REF. |
|
04.11.07 |
Llanbedr Church |
Kingdom 1 |
Rev. Huw Butler |
Luke 19.
1-10 |
I am sure
that we could come up with many words to describe Zacchaeus – I am equally
sure that a saint would not be one of them! Having said that, of course, it
would depend upon your definition of a saint and what sainthood is all
about. I have three definitions of sainthood for you as I progress through
the sermon today. The first comes from Eric Hoffer, who offers the following
description:
Many of the
insights of a saint stem from his experience as a sinner.
If we apply
this definition to Zacchaeus, at the point when Jesus first called him to
come down from the tree he had climbed, he was surely well qualified in the
second half of this statement!
We know that
Zacchaeus was a tax collector, and not just any tax collecto but the chief
tax collector for that area – maybe for the whole city of Jericho? Of all
people in Palestine tax collectors were the most hated. At the time of Jesus
tax collectors were employed by the Roman authorities – as such they were
regarded with mistrust and thought of a traitors by the general public. To
make matters worse the taxation system left itself open to abuse. The tax
collectors or “publicani” as they were called seem to have been prone to
extortion and malpractice and generally had a bad reputation. It has been
said that due to the complexity of the system a tax collector could stop a
man on the road unpack his goods and more or less charge him what he liked!
Tax collectors could also offer to lend money if payment could not be made,
and of course would charge exorbitant rates of interest. Adding all of these
things together it is little wonder that robbers, murderers and tax
collectors were classed together.
So then,
Zacchaeus, being a chief tax collector, was obviously very rich, having
everything going for him – no doubt servants, a lovely house and plenty of
food.
He would not
have been liked by the people but I find it hard to believe that he was
lonely and an outcast which we are sometimes given the impression of. He
would have been associated with the ruling Roman classes and so it seems
doubtful that he would have been too worried about being unpopular.
Could it be
that he was feeling pangs of conscience about the way he was treating
people? Did he feel an “outcast” in the religious sense (he would have most
certainly ben barred from the synagogue). If this was the case maybe he saw
in Jesus a way back to God. Perhaps he had heard about Jesus, this miracle
worker, teacher and personality who was deeply spiritual and yet associated
with tax collectors and sinners. It would be understandable that all these
things would make him curious. Did he feel that there was something lacking
in his life – was he in need in some way feeling that Jesus could fulfil
that need? Was he in some way dissatisfied with his life – seemingly
possessing everything and yet recognising that God shaped hole that needed
to be filled.
Whatever his
reasons, one thing is certain, he could never in his wildest dreams have
expected Jesus to invite himself to his house that very day! It was a moment
that would change his life!
No man can
advance three paces on the road to perfection unless Jesus Christ walks
beside him.
(Robert H. Benson)
Sainthood is
not about being perfect but is to be travelling along the road with Jesus as
our companion. Zacchaeus was certainly not perfect – Jesus would have known
this full well. But Jesus offered Zacchaeus a hand of friendship – a public
display of friendship, in fact, through sharing in a meal with him.
Interestingly Jesus didn’t set down any demands about how Zacchaeus should
change his ways before Jesus would share table fellowship with him. The meal
was to be shared, but we know that Zacchaeus’ response was to make amends
for the money he had taken wrongfully. Within the presence of Jesus he
recognised the error of his ways – however, he probably knew this already!
Perhaps then, it wasn’t so much the recognition of these faults that Jesus
brought to their friendship but rather bringing about in Zacchaeus the
courage to change and be transformed. Jesus exclaimed, “today salvation has
come to this house” – salvation, new life lived in the power of God’s love.
Zacchaeus may have been overwhelmed by his sense of guilt and shame in terms
of the lifestyle he had chosen. But we also notice that it was not shame and
a sense of obligation that brought about his response. Zacchaeus welcomed
Jesus gladly – he returned all of his ill gotten gains joyfully – it was not
something that he felt he had to do – rather it was the outworking of the
joy of his salvation – that something which had been missing, the God shaped
hole, had been filled. The moment Zacchaeus responded to Jesus invitation he
began to travel in the company of Jesus along the road to sainthood a road
that inevitably brings about change and transformation into the likeness of
Christ. The road to sainthood is perhaps the wrong phrase to use because it
tends to suggest that we only become a saint after we have died. The road of
sainthood is better. Saints are people like you and me travelling our
earthly life with Jesus as our companion; saints are also that great cloud
of witnesses who have passed beyond this life on earth but now share a
closer companionship with Jesus in heaven. Just as Jesus overcame death on
the cross to rise to a new and transformed life on Easter morning – so the
saints in heaven share in the promises of Jesus and his risen life.
Saints are
persons who make it easier for others to believe in God.
(Nathan Soderblom)
When the
“good” people (as opposed to the tax collectors and sinners) were grumbling
and complaining about the way Jesus befriended Zacchaeus Jesus responded by
saying: “The Son of Man came to seek and to save the lost”
We were
recently privileged to be given a talk and presentation by some of the team
of Wrexham Street Pastors. It was a very moving, inspiring, humbling
and challenging experience. They were eager to explain that their
overarching aim was not to preach but rather to care. This was a constant
source of surprise to the people they met on the streets late at night.
They left us
with a challenge. How can we be light and salt? How can we be instrumental
in bringing the colour and flavour of God’s Kingdom within our own
communities?
As they
recounted some of their experiences it was quite evident that they were
people who made it easier for others to believe in God.
We don’t
know, but I like to think that Zacchaeus, himself, would have been someone
who would now potentially have the ability to make it easier for others to
believe in God. Why? Because he knew that he was a sinner – he knew he had
done things wrong, he knew that he was not perfect, but by his actions he
was now showing that he had changed – rather he was in the process of being
changed. If he developed some kind f self righteous attitude because he had
now given back the money he had gained unfairly then he would have no
credibility. Actions speak much louder than words. If, on the other hand, he
acted with a sense of humility following the example of Jesus graciousness
then what a powerful witness he would be. If Jesus had such an effect upon
someone like Zacchaeus – then Jesus can have a life changing affect upon
anybody and everybody.
As we think
of Zacchaeus today and reflect upon his story let us remember those three
definitions of sainthood.
Many of the
insights of a saint stem from his experience as a sinner.
(Eric Hoffer)
No man can
advance three paces on the road to perfection unless Jesus Christ walks
beside him.
(Robert H. Benson)
Saints are
persons who make it easier for others to believe in God.
(Nathan Soderblom)
As we have
applied them to Zacchaeus let us, over this week, try to apply them to
ourselves and consider what kind of saint on earth we may be!
|